Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This research provides a comprehensive analysis of two-component non-Gaussian composite models and mixture models for insurance claims data. These models have gained attraction in actuarial literature because they provide flexible methods for curve-fitting. We consider 256 composite models and 256 mixture models derived from 16 popular parametric distributions. The composite models are developed by piecing together two distributions at a threshold value, while the mixture models are developed as convex combinations of two distributions on the same domain. Two real insurance datasets from different industries are considered. Model selection criteria and risk metrics of the top 20 models in each category (composite/mixture) are provided by using the ‘single-best model’ approach. Finally, for each of the datasets, composite models seem to provide better risk estimates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marambakuyana et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: