Key result
Perioperative bridging anticoagulation markedly increased the incidence of major postoperative bleeding compared to matched controls (8.4% vs. 0.8%) in patients undergoing general and visceral surgery.
Why the study?
With increasing numbers of patients on oral anticoagulants undergoing elective surgery, this study aimed to explore the postoperative bleeding risk associated with perioperative bridging anticoagulation.
Does perioperative bridging anticoagulation increase the risk of postoperative bleeding complications in patients undergoing general and visceral surgery?
Cohort (n=526)
No
Does perioperative bridging anticoagulation increase the risk of postoperative bleeding complications in patients undergoing general and visceral surgery?
Perioperative bridging anticoagulation, particularly with full-therapeutic dose LMWH, markedly increases the risk of major bleeding in general and visceral surgery without significantly reducing thromboembolic events.
Bridging may increase postoperative bleeding; leaves open optimal perioperative strategies pending randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: Increasing numbers of patients receiving oral anticoagulants are undergoing elective surgery. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is frequently applied as bridging therapy during perioperative interruption of anticoagulation. The aim of this study was to explore the postoperative bleeding risk of patients receiving surgery under bridging anticoagulation. METHODS: We performed a monocentric retrospective two-arm matched cohort study. Patients that received perioperative bridging anticoagulation were compared to a matched control group with identical surgical procedure, age, and sex. Emergency and vascular operations were excluded. The primary endpoint was the incidence of major postoperative bleeding. Secondary endpoints were minor postoperative bleeding, thromboembolic events, length of stay, and in-hospital mortality. Multivariate analysis explored risk factors of major postoperative bleeding. RESULTS: A total of 263 patients in each study arm were analyzed. The patient cohort included the entire field of general and visceral surgery including a large proportion of major oncological resections. Bridging anticoagulation increased the postoperative incidence of major bleeding events (8% vs. 1%; p < 0.001) as well as minor bleeding events (14% vs. 5%; p < 0.001). Thromboembolic events were equally rare in both groups (1% vs. 2%; p = 0.45). No effect on mortality was observed (1.5% vs. 1.9%). Independent risk factors of major postoperative bleeding were full-therapeutic dose of LMWH, renal insufficiency, and the procedure-specific bleeding risk. CONCLUSION: Perioperative bridging anticoagulation, especially full-therapeutic dose LMWH, markedly increases the risk of postoperative bleeding complications in general and visceral surgery. Surgeons should carefully consider the practice of routine bridging.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lock et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Patients receiving oral anticoagulants undergoing elective general and visceral surgery (n=526). Perioperative bridging anticoagulation vs. Matched controls without bridging anticoagulation was evaluated on Incidence of major postoperative bleeding (p=<0.001). Perioperative bridging anticoagulation markedly increased the incidence of major postoperative bleeding compared to matched controls (8.4% vs. 0.8%) in patients undergoing general and visceral surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: