Key result
Induced ventricular fibrillation exhibited a statistically greater degree of electrical regularity compared to spontaneous episodes in 9 subjects with implanted cardioverter defibrillators.
Why the study?
Does the electrical regularity of induced ventricular fibrillation differ from spontaneous ventricular fibrillation in patients with ICDs?
Observational (n=9)
Does the electrical regularity of induced ventricular fibrillation differ from spontaneous ventricular fibrillation in patients with ICDs?
Induced ventricular fibrillation exhibits a statistically greater degree of electrical regularity compared to spontaneous episodes, suggesting differences in their underlying electrophysiological organization.
Induced versus spontaneous VF regularity differences should not change practice; hypothesis-generating for VF organization in larger cohorts.
AIMS: The degree of organization of ventricular fibrillation (VF) can be examined in terms of the regularity of the electrical activity within the ventricle. Using electrograms (EGMs) stored within implanted cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), we examined the hypothesis that the degree of organization, or regularity, was different if the VF was induced by electrical stimulation as opposed to occurring clinically due to ischemia or scar. METHODS AND RESULTS: We compared the statistical characteristics of EGMs recorded by ICDs during spontaneous episodes with those induced during device testing in the laboratory in nine subjects. Regularity of the VF EGM signals was quantified using autocorrelation, Shannon entropy (derived from cycle to cycle activation complexes), and Kolmogorov entropy (derived from eight second long episodes of VF). All three measurements showed a statistically greater degree of regularity for induced VF than in spontaneous episodes. CONCLUSION: Analysis of VF EGMs using these techniques is novel and robust, providing a new way for assessing electrical organization during VF. The clinical significance and utility of differences in VF waveform regularity is unclear at this stage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lever et al. (2007) conducted an observational in Ventricular fibrillation (n=9). Induced ventricular fibrillation vs. Spontaneous ventricular fibrillation was evaluated on Regularity of VF EGM signals (quantified using autocorrelation, Shannon entropy, and Kolmogorov entropy). Induced ventricular fibrillation exhibited a statistically greater degree of electrical regularity compared to spontaneous episodes in 9 subjects with implanted cardioverter defibrillators.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: