// Christiane Margue 1 , Susanne Reinsbach 1,* , Demetra Philippidou 1,* , Nicolas Beaume 1 , Casandra Walters 1 , Jochen G. Schneider 1 , Dorothée Nashan 1,2 , Iris Behrmann 1 , Stephanie Kreis 1 1 Life Sciences Research Unit, University of Luxembourg, Luxembourg 2 Klinikum Dortmund GmbH, Germany * These authors have contributed equally to this work Correspondence to: Stephanie Kreis, email: // Keywords : serum/tissue samples, circulating miRNAs, healthy miRNome, miRNA qPCR arrays, melanoma biomarkers Received : January 21, 2015 Accepted : February 28, 2015 Published : March 26, 2015 Abstract MiRNAs are increasingly recognized as biomarkers for the diagnosis of cancers where they are profiled from tumor tissue (intracellular miRNAs) or serum/plasma samples (extracellular miRNAs). To improve detection of reliable biomarkers from blood samples, we first compiled a healthy reference miRNome and established a well-controlled analysis pipeline allowing for standardized quantification of circulating miRNAs. Using whole miRNome and custom qPCR arrays, miRNA expression profiles were analyzed in 126 serum, whole blood and tissue samples of healthy volunteers and melanoma patients and in primary melanocyte and keratinocyte cell lines. We found characteristic signatures with excellent prognostic scores only in late stage but not in early stage melanoma patients. Upon comparison of melanoma tissue miRNomes with matching serum samples, several miRNAs were identified to be exclusively tissue-derived (miR-30b-5p, miR-374a-5p and others) while others had higher expression levels in serum (miR-3201 and miR-122-5p). Here we have compiled a healthy and widely applicable miRNome from serum samples and we provide strong evidence that levels of cell-free miRNAs only change significantly at later stages of melanoma progression, which has serious implications for miRNA biomarker studies in cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Margue et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: