Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Although bullying at school is an important topic, its long-term relation to anti-social development is rarely investigated. AIM: To study the relation between bullying in youth and anti-social outcomes in adulthood. METHODS: A group of 63 males (bullies and victims over-sampled) from the Erlangen-Nuremberg Bullying Study were investigated at ages 15 and 25. Bullying was assessed with the Olweus Bully/Victim Questionnaire. Outcome measures included self-reported delinquency, violence, aggressiveness, drug use, impulsivity and psychopathy. In addition to bivariate correlations, hierarchical regressions were used to control for family and individual risk factors. RESULTS: Bullying was a strong predictor of nearly all anti-social outcomes. Physical bullying was more predictive than verbal/indirect bullying. Controlling for family risks and externalising/internalising problems reduced effect sizes, but bullying remained a sound predictor. Victimisation was not related to anti-social outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Bullying seems to be a key risk marker for anti-social development. Therefore, studies on whole-school anti-bullying programmes and child-oriented or family-oriented strategies of crime prevention should be more integrated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bender et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: