Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
State programmatic expertise is an important asset to federal systems, but this expertise is not always informative to federal decision-makers. I argue the degree to which state expertise is informative to federal decision-makers depends on how well the policy interests of state and federal levels are aligned. I illustrate variation in these conditions using case studies of congressional politics over the Medicaid program. I then apply a statistical test, which demonstrates that states’ programmatic expertise regarding Medicaid is less persuasive to congressional committee members compared to other witnesses who are equally knowledgeable. The results suggest a “failure of federalism,” where the public good potential of state programmatic expertise often is not realized in the federal system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kevin Esterling (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: