Key result
Pretreatment with parenteral anticoagulants before edoxaban therapy in patients with venous thromboembolism did not significantly alter the risk of major bleeding or VTE deterioration compared to no pretreatment.
Why the study?
Edoxaban requires pretreatment with parenteral anticoagulants for VTE, but this pretreatment is not always performed in real-world clinical practice.
Does edoxaban without preceding parenteral anticoagulants provide similar safety and effectiveness compared to edoxaban with preceding parenteral anticoagulants in patients with VTE?
Observational (n=364)
No
Does edoxaban without preceding parenteral anticoagulants provide similar safety and effectiveness compared to edoxaban with preceding parenteral anticoagulants in patients with VTE?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In a real-world setting, edoxaban treatment for VTE without preceding parenteral anticoagulants showed similar safety and effectiveness to treatment with a parenteral lead-in.
Objective Edoxaban is an anticoagulant used for venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment and requires pretreatment with parenteral anticoagulants. However, pretreatment is not always performed in the clinical setting. In this study, we investigated the safety and effectiveness of edoxaban treatment in patients with VTE with or without pretreatment. Methods We retrospectively enrolled 364 patients who received edoxaban for VTE treatment between September 2014 and March 2020 and investigated patient demographics, VTE recurrence, and major bleeding as clinical outcomes in patients with or without pretreatment. Furthermore, the factors contributing to pretreatment decisions were assessed. Results Patients without pretreatment (n=208) had more active cancer cases and fewer pulmonary embolism complications than those with pretreatment (n=156). Lower levels of hemoglobin and higher levels of white blood cell counts, C-reactive protein, and D-dimer at the diagnosis were found in patients who received pretreatment than in those without pretreatment. No symptomatic VTE recurrence was observed. After propensity score matching, the cumulative incidence of major bleeding was not significantly higher in patients with pretreatment than in those without it (log-rank test, p=0.136). The incidence of deteriorated VTE on imaging did not significantly differ between patients with and without pretreatment, even after propensity matching (log-rank test, p=0.414). Conclusion In a real-world clinical setting, where physicians determined the use of parenteral anticoagulant lead-in according to their experience, patient demographics, and VTE characteristics, no significant differences were found regarding safety and effectiveness in edoxaban-treated VTE patients with or without pretreatment with parenteral anticoagulants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ueno et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Venous thromboembolism (n=364). Parenteral anticoagulant pretreatment vs. No parenteral anticoagulant pretreatment was evaluated on Major bleeding (propensity-matched) (p=0.136). Pretreatment with parenteral anticoagulants before edoxaban therapy in patients with venous thromboembolism did not significantly alter the risk of major bleeding or VTE deterioration compared to no pretreatment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: