Key result
Three-dimensional left atrial volume index was significantly higher in patients with abnormal versus normal dobutamine stress echocardiography results (31.5 vs 27.4 mL/m2, P=0.004).
Why the study?
Does 3D left atrial volume index or carotid plaque presence predict abnormal dobutamine stress echocardiography results in patients with normal resting wall motion?
Observational (n=130)
Does 3D left atrial volume index or carotid plaque presence predict abnormal dobutamine stress echocardiography results in patients with normal resting wall motion?
3D assessment of left atrial volume index, but not 2D assessment or carotid scanning, provides additive value in predicting abnormal dobutamine stress echocardiography results.
3D left atrial volume index was associated with abnormal dobutamine stress echocardiography; hypothesis-generating for additive prediction, needs prospective validation.
AIMS: to evaluate whether the three-dimensional (3D) left atrial volume index (LAVI) and/or the presence of carotid plaques (CP) can predict the result of dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE), thereby aiding interpretation. METHODS AND RESULTS: we studied 130 patients (52 male, mean age 63 ± 11 years) with normal resting wall motion (WM) undergoing DSE. All patients had the end-systolic 2D and 3D LAVI measured, as well as bilateral carotid scanning. DSE was reported as abnormal in 50 (38.5%) patients. 3D end-systolic LAVI measurements were significantly higher (31.5 ± 8.2 vs 27.4 ± 7.4 mL/m(2), P = 0.004) in those with an abnormal DSE. The two groups did not differ significantly on the 2D derived maximum LAVI measurements (36.2 ± 9.5 vs 34.2 ± 11.2, P = 0.299) and the presence of plaques in the carotid arteries (89.1 vs. 76.2%, P = 0.100). Receiver operating characteristic curves were created to define cut-offs that could predict the DSE result for the 3D LAVI. A 3D LAVI of >24.5 mL/m(2) had a sensitivity of 80% for predicting an abnormal DSE, whereas a value of >36.0 mL/m(2) had a specificity of 93% for the same cause. Intra-observer (r = 0.997, P < 0.0001) and inter-observer (r = 0.961, P < 0.0001) variability for 3D LAVI measurements was found to be excellent. CONCLUSION: three-dimensional (but not 2D) assessment of LAVI may offer additional information in predicting the result of DSE. Carotid scanning did not offer additional information for the same cause.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sachpekidis et al. (2010) conducted an observational in Normal resting wall motion undergoing dobutamine stress echocardiography (n=130). 3D left atrial volume index (LAVI) was evaluated on Mean 3D end-systolic LAVI (mL/m2) in abnormal vs normal DSE (p=0.004). Three-dimensional left atrial volume index was significantly higher in patients with abnormal versus normal dobutamine stress echocardiography results (31.5 vs 27.4 mL/m2, P=0.004).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: