Key result
Serum FABP4 levels and carotid intima media thickness were significantly increased in patients with subclinical and overt hypothyroidism compared to healthy controls, but FABP4 levels did not correlate with CIMT.
Why the study?
The study was designed to evaluate the relationship between serum fatty acid binding protein 4 (FABP4) levels and carotid intima media thickness (CIMT) in patients with hypothyroidism.
Is there a relationship between serum FABP4 levels and carotid intima media thickness in patients with hypothyroidism?
Cross-Sectional (n=120)
No
Is there a relationship between serum FABP4 levels and carotid intima media thickness in patients with hypothyroidism?
Absolute Event Rate: 7.03% vs 5.22%
p-value: p=0.014
While FABP4 levels are elevated in hypothyroidism, they do not correlate with carotid intima media thickness, suggesting FABP4 does not drive atherosclerosis in this population without metabolic disorders.
Does not support FABP4 as CIMT driver in hypothyroidism; hypothesis-generating for metabolic interactions in prospective cohorts.
Background/aim: The aim of this study is to evaluate the relationship between serum fatty acid binding protein 4 (FABP4) levels and carotid intima media thickness (CIMT) in patients with hypothyroidism. aterials and methods: Forty subclinical hypothyroidism patients, 40 overt hypothyroidism patients, and 40 healthy controls were enrolled in the study. Blood pressure, body mass index, CIMT, fasting blood sugar, creatine, alanine aminotransferase, lipid parameters, insulin, free thyroxine, triiodothyronine, thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), thyroid peroxidase antibody (anti-TPO), thyroglobulin antibody (anti-TG), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (Hs-CRP), and FABP4 levels of all participants were measured. Results: Serum FABP4 levels were significantly higher in patients with subclinical and overt hypothyroidism than healthy controls (HCs) (P = 0.044 and P = 0.014, respectively). There was no significant difference in terms of FABP4 levels between patients with subclinical and overt hypothyroidism (P = 0.641). Serum TSH levels and serum FABP4 levels were positively correlated (r = 0.201, P = 0.039). CIMT was found to be higher in patients with subclinical and overt hypothyroidism than in HCs (P = 0.042 and P < 0.001, respectively). No correlation was found between CIMT and FABP4 levels (r = 0.038, P = 0.702). There was a positive correlation between CIMT and TSH, anti-TPO, anti-TG, triglycerides (TG), and total cholesterol levels. It was found that high TG levels were an independent factor that increased CIMT (r = 0.382, r2 = 0.146). Conclusion: In patients with subclinical and overt hypothyroidism, the level of FABP4 increases and this increase is correlated with the increase in TSH level. It is thought that FABP4 does not play a role in atherosclerosis development in patients with hypothyroidism without metabolic disorder.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
TAN et al. (2019) conducted a cross-sectional in Hypothyroidism (subclinical and overt) (n=120). Hypothyroidism (subclinical and overt) vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on Serum FABP4 levels (overt hypothyroidism vs healthy controls) (p=0.014). Serum FABP4 levels and carotid intima media thickness were significantly increased in patients with subclinical and overt hypothyroidism compared to healthy controls, but FABP4 levels did not correlate with CIMT.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: