Analyzes procedural trends and safety reporting in unilateral biportal endoscopy technical notes from a medical journal, indicating areas for improvement.
Objective: This study aimed to analyze procedural trends, safety-related content, and reporting completeness in unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE)-focused Technical Notes published in the Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique (JMISST) in 2025.Methods: All regular and supplementary issues of JMISST Volume 10 were screened. UBE-focused articles formally classified as Technical Notes were included. Articles were categorized into 3 procedural tiers: lumbar refinement and fusion innovation, thoracic expansion, and advanced-complexity applications. Reporting completeness was assessed descriptively across 5 domains: postoperative imaging, follow-up or outcomes, complication reporting, safety discussion, and supplementary video availability.Results: Ten UBE-focused Technical Notes were included. Five articles (50.0%) addressed lumbar refinement and fusion innovation, 2 (20.0%) addressed thoracic expansion, and 3 (30.0%) addressed advanced-complexity applications. Postoperative imaging was reported in 8 articles (80.0%), follow-up or outcomes in 9 (90.0%), explicit complication reporting in 7 (70.0%), safety discussion in 10 (100%), and supplementary video availability in 4 (40.0%). The median reporting score was 4 (range, 1–5). Recurrent themes included stability-conscious decompression, construct-oriented fusion strategy, pressure-aware irrigation, pleural and dural protection, and staged adoption of complex UBE procedures.Conclusion: UBE Technical Notes published in JMISST in 2025 reflected expansion from lumbar decompression toward fusion, thoracic, intradural, lesion/tumor, and revision or salvage applications. Technical guidance and safety discussion were consistently reported, but follow-up, complication reporting, and operative visualization remained variable. Standardized reporting and further clinical validation are needed as UBE is applied to more complex indications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abudayeh et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: