Position paper outlines updated guidelines for managing PAOD in diabetes, emphasizing diagnostics and treatment efficacy.
Position paper of the DDG, DGA, DGG and DeGiR on the Diagnosis and Treatment of PAOD in Diabetes Mellitus German Diabetes Association : Clinical Practice Guidelines This is a translation of the DDG clinical practice guideline published in Diabetol Stoffwechs 2025; 20: S454–S467. DOI: 10.1055/a-2593-4467. Notice of update The DDG clinical practice guidelines are updated regularly during the second half of the calendar year. Please ensure that you read and cite the respective current version. UPDATES TO CONTENT AND DIFFERENT RECOMMENDATIONS COMPARED TO THE PREVIOUS YEAR’S VERSION Change 1: Drug therapy of symptomatic peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) in stage II (claudication) in people with diabetes. Reason: Improvement of walking performance, quality of life and reduction of major adverse limb event in people with diabetes and PAOD in the intermittent claudication stage with weekly therapy with semaglutide (1 mg/wk s.c.) Supporting reference: [ 1 ] Change 2: Recommendations for intermittent claudication modified with emphasis on structured gait training Reason: New 2024 S3 guideline on PAOD Supporting reference: [ 2 ] Change 3: Update of interventional treatment recommendations for the aorto-iliac, femoro-popliteal and cruro-pedal vascular segments Reason: Adaptation of the recommendations according to current data and guideline Supporting reference: [ 2 ] Change 4: Critical limb-threatening ischaemia Reason: Adaptation of the recommendations according to current data and guideline Supporting reference: [ 2 ] [ 3 ] This clinical practice recommendation is based on the current German and international guideline recommendations [ 2 ] [ 4 ] and serves as a short, clinically oriented guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD). Peripheral circulatory disorders of the pelvic and leg arteries are one of the secondary complications suffered by patients with diabetes. The term covers stenoses, occlusions and—to a lesser extent—aneurysmal vascular changes of the pelvic leg arteries. Arterial vascular lesions occur mostly in later life; however, people with diabetes are often affected prematurely. In these patients, the time of the initial manifestation also depends on the duration of the disease and the quality of metabolic control. Only 25% of affected patients have symptoms. Especially, in patients with diabetes, atheromatosis of the peripheral vessels is aggravated by chronic inflammatory vessel wall processes and hypercoagulability. Second to nicotine abuse, diabetes is the most important risk factor for the occurrence of PAOD.[ 5 ] [ 6 ] Patients with diabetes have a two to four-time higher risk of developing PAOD than patients without diabetes. Up to 30% of all patients with claudication and 50% of all patients with critical limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) are people with DM.[ 7 ] PAOD patients with diabetes have specific anatomical–morphological and clinical characteristics which must be considered in the diagnostic and therapeutic approach. Compared to people without DM, PAOD in people with DM develops earlier, progresses more rapidly and changes over more frequently to CLTI. Anatomically–morphologically, a multi-segmental manifestation with long, calcified stenoses/occlusions of the lower leg arteries with insufficient collateral formation is typical. Clinically, people with diabetes often first consult their doctors because of a critical ischaemia, in part because the intermittent claudication preceding a critical ischaemia and the pain at rest can remain masked for a long time by the diabetic sensory polyneuropathy (PNP). The prognosis for a life without amputations is poor for people with DM. On the one hand, this is due to the high ischaemia and ulcer recurrence rates and the associated minor and major amputations. On the other hand, it results from the high rate of comorbidities and co-prevalence of target organ damage such as cardiac and renal insufficiency, each of which on its own increases mortality. The most significant consequences of diabetic peripheral circulatory disorders are foot lesions (ulcers and gangrene) and minor and major amputations as a result of ischaemic or neuroischaemic diabetic foot syndrome (DFS; [ Table 1 ]). Table 1 Classification of the peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) according to Fontaine and Rutherford Fontaine Rutherford Stage Clinical picture Degree Category Clinical picture I Asymptomatic 0 0 Asymptomatic IIa Walking distance >200 m I 1 Mild IC IIb Walking distance <200 m I 2 Moderate IC I 3 Severe IC III Ischaemic pain at rest II 4 Ischaemic pain at rest IV Ulcer and gangrene III 5 Small patch necrosis III 6 Large patch necrosis Abbreviation: IC, intermittent claudication. WHAT DOES IT MEAN? The number of patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) and diabetes is constantly increasing. The risk of amputation in people with diabetes mellitus is significantly increased when PAOD is present. Timely detection of PAOD reduces the amputation and cardiovascular event rates if treatment is in accordance with guidelines. Interdisciplinary cooperation and rapid revascularisation are crucial in critical limb-threatening ischaemia. Diagnostics of peripheral arterial occlusive disease in people with diabetes mellitus Non-invasive haemodynamic vascular function diagnostics in people with DM allows conclusions to be drawn about the severity of the circulatory disorder and provides prognostic information on the spontaneous course, cardiovascular (CV) risk and/or wound healing. Target-oriented diagnostics facilitate choosing the appropriate therapy and enable monitoring of the course of the disease during and after vascular treatment. VASCULAR DIAGNOSTICS FOR PEOPLE WITH DIABETES MELLITUS Clinical examination including recording of pulse status and capillary pulse as well as a qualitative comparison of skin colour and temperature Doppler ankle or toe pressure measurement (ankle-brachial index [ABI]); toe-brachial index [TBI]) Colour-coded duplex sonography with pulse curve analysis Pulse oscillography of the digital arteries (DPO) or light reflection rheography (LRR) Transcutaneous oxygen measurement (tcPO 2 ) In people with DM, these non-invasive diagnostic procedures should be used liberally if there is a suspicion of PAOD, or if a foot lesion is present or is not healing. In the clinical examination, it is important to examine the reactive skin circulation of the feet (capillary pulse) as well as perform the palpation of foot pulses. Although the pulse examination of lower extremities is helpful, the frequency of the PAOD is overestimated in the absence of pulses. Conversely, palpable foot pulses do not rule out the presence of PAOD. The capillary pulse as a reactive filling of the skin after pressure indicates the presence of a critical circulatory problem. People with diabetes mellitus with peripheral arterial occlusive disease should have a regular clinical foot examination Ankle-brachial index (ABI) is determined using non-invasive doppler ultrasound to measure blood pressures at rest and/or after exertion and is a suitable test for detecting PAOD. Decreased peripheral pressure values are evidence of the presence of PAOD and indicate the CV risk in the patient. The ABI value with the lowest ankle artery pressure is decisive for the diagnosis of PAOD. An ABI value at rest below 0.9 is a deemed confirmation of the presence of PAOD. Nevertheless, normal values of the ABI cannot reliably rule out PAOD in the case of parallel DM, as calcification of the media can lead to false high values. The pulse curve analysis, pulse oscillography of the digital arteries and toe pressure measurement with the determination of the toe-brachial index (TBI) are of particular importance and are used for confirming PAOD [ 2 ] [ 4 ] in the presence of classic media sclerosis (ABI >1.3) Ankle-brachial index measurement is important for confirming the peripheral arterial occlusive disease and risk vascular must be if ABI of toe pressures of ankle pressures of or a oxygen pressure (tcPO 2 ) value of is determined in patients with 2 ] In such the risk of developing a foot ulcer is increased Table 2 ]). Table 2 and prognosis of PAOD based on Doppler values. according to [ 2 ] [ ] [ ] ABI pressure pressure PAOD sclerosis of wound chronic limb-threatening PAOD, peripheral arterial occlusive foot ischaemia also be present with palpable foot pulses or normal toe pressure values lesion in people with DM Non-invasive haemodynamic of the leg vessels are to course and therapy in patients with PAOD. and digital should be in symptomatic or patients if there is therapeutic to the of people with DM and diagnostics and therapy are DIAGNOSTICS Colour-coded duplex sonography of the pelvic leg arteries of the pelvic leg arteries with or 2 Colour-coded duplex sonography is of particular importance as a non-invasive haemodynamic results with and allows to be on the and of vascular there are using or is however, it is important to of and should be in for in the case of a or to and a vascular The renal function in people with DM a in the of with the or used significantly and of the patients must be 2 can be used in procedures and a for renal In lower leg it is by the of a of a The for diagnostics should be on of peripheral arterial occlusive disease in people with diabetes mellitus of therapy The therapy of PAOD in people with DM two the of peripheral blood in symptomatic patients as well as the therapy of vascular risk and with of and [ 3 ] and [ ]). Table 3 Treatment Stage of PAOD Fontaine Rutherford of risk training reduction of cardiovascular Fontaine Rutherford of risk training Improvement of walking and quality of life as well as pain reduction Fontaine II Rutherford of risk training reduction of peripheral vascular Fontaine Rutherford of vascular of ischaemia the leg Fontaine Rutherford of minor or major amputation Abbreviation: PAOD, peripheral arterial occlusive Table 4 therapy according to [ 2 ] Fontaine I II III IV factor diabetes blood pressure treatment or structured vascular for people with diabetes mellitus Drug or wound treatment therapy therapy of high and suitable vascular in stage The treatment for to Fontaine stage 3 structured gait training also in for people with for walking or and are as as gait In to vascular reduction in of nicotine in and the treatment of arterial and DM are therapeutic treatment in people with DM with symptomatic PAOD the of or is to 2 ] the risk of ischaemia and In to which is in symptomatic PAOD, the of is in all of PAOD, with a target value of and at a 50% reduction in the value to the 2 ] therapy for peripheral arterial occlusive disease Patients with symptomatic with or as a secondary its to in symptomatic PAOD ] should not be to patients with CV 7 ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] and this is also for PAOD 2 ] therapy with and not present over with ] therapy with to 5 ] can be in to a of 6 2 ] patients with symptomatic PAOD after revascularisation and a high risk of ischaemic a therapy with and a reduction of the major adverse CV event and CV and major adverse limb event circulatory ] This to patients with DM. The of with in with can be in the current German [ 2 ] and international ] [ ] for the treatment of PAOD, the ischaemia risk must be of in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease In all patients with arterial from a reduction in blood ] and patients with PAOD in particular have CV In blood pressure therapy associated with a CV event ] [ ] In patients with PAOD, blood pressures of and result in more leg ] this the blood pressure should not be in PAOD are the of for PAOD Patients with PAOD and cardiac can also be with for intermittent claudication and CLTI. FOR PAOD for Asymptomatic for than risk for ischaemic FOR WITH PAOD pressure target in PAOD are the of for PAOD therapy for diabetes and peripheral arterial occlusive disease is a that therapy a on and CV in diabetic patients with ] [ ] [ ] the on the of is significantly in diabetic therapy therapy significantly reduces the of adverse in the by according to two from a of and in to the significant risk reduction for ischaemic and CV ] [ ] diabetes patients also a reduction in the amputation rate [ ] and in the walking to of the this to the therapy and therapy or ] On in the walking distance of m can be in PAOD ] the data which diabetes patients with PAOD, the data target values for of and a reduction of more than 50% of the for the reduction of CV risk in PAOD patients with DM.[ ] of of in the in The in the in the of the target of the The [ ] with patients a significant reduction in with a of to a after a duration of Patients with or of therapy in PAOD have not with this that from this of can be used as in the and must also be there are specific on PAOD in diabetes. therapy The evidence for PAOD with in diabetes is lower than for the in the presence of the specific of disorder in 2 diabetes. lower and more than ] of the reduction by of the amputation rate by a in people with diabetes. The rate of major amputations in patients with not ] that such as and lower of the a on CV risk and the risk reduction of adverse in the in patients with PAOD. The of this a reduction in limb-threatening ischaemia, or peripheral for patients with or without PAOD at the of the ] also to with a reduction in The of with to PAOD in DM not ] can be used in patients with PAOD on therapy or in patients with the of the and to the of high therapy In the case of PAOD, a therapy with the for the with and without should be to the amputation and target of and reduction of by more than 50% from the in with and can be used as for or as a for target value for peripheral arterial occlusive disease is also the of for people with diabetes and PAOD. This is the data are in this published the on CV not on extremities and rates after peripheral ] and data on PAOD are should be used in when the to the high risk of and the in patients with these are of ] the in for CV in patients with 2 diabetes and patients are with the and ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] In the amputations also considered a significant over the are for In is associated with increased risk of is not as a therapy in the treatment of 2 diabetes. it in at the of the 4 The CV and a of 4 to the CV or to or In the however, significantly more with due to which is this should be used with in patients with CV or in of PAOD have not ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] The of and semaglutide on CV such as and and to in ] [ ] [ ] semaglutide in with increased rate of which is this should not be used in patients with diabetic in with ] to PAOD, data from the are for this of which a significant in walking distance after of therapy with 1 ] CV have for The of to in and significantly lower mortality. data on PAOD and/or amputations are ] 2 The the and the data on the of the and on CV such as CV and and ] [ ] [ ] [ ] The and the in the amputation which is not on the in the amputation rate significantly increased in the In the published however, this not ] published to increased risk for in PAOD in of therapy of with 2 to ] In of the number of that do not this these data are and data on this are this is should be used with as the for 2 DM and PAOD, and should be in the presence of are for therapy for patients with PAOD. reduction of CV be for in the for there increased of CV complications that the therapy can be considered for the CV ] [ ] Especially, in the presence of CV should be used in people with 2 in the initial as after or The data therapy and PAOD are is also the of for people with diabetes and PAOD. PAOD is the should be to or a the of is for 2 DM with PAOD as the not with is a reduction of cardiovascular not therapy to revascularisation are or In should be as and more as 2 ] the should be or such as the stage of PAOD, the and of the vascular the presence of a and the therapy of the are important and must be of therapy The therapy of PAOD for people with and without DM depends on the of the disease and the affected vascular 2 ] [ ] [ ] [ ] claudication In intermittent II PAOD, the therapy is of walking distance and quality of life in the as well as the reduction of CV and mortality. all patients at this stage should be and structured gait training including as initial of a should be the claudication of therapy is in the case of or revascularisation can be is important to out the also in the case of the results are by gait training and An initial with structured gait training the 2 ] [ ] [ ] treatment recommendations according to vascular The of treatment should be with the of and The should be the vascular and the to in treatment in the pelvic the treatment in most is therapy procedures are for people with a long life or therapy procedures are a which often to the and the to the In the treatment of the is over 2 ] the rate is over for 5 after with In of the for in the for and in the case of lesions the and the a of the should be The of is for when the artery and are without are should be used from to and in the ] should be considered for lesions with the of the The should be by vascular 2 ] to current should be used for the treatment of femoro-popliteal as have to the rate and the rate to with should also be used for in the femoro-popliteal to the lesions of the with should be to the In the case of a femoro-popliteal should be over for because of the higher rate and lower ] [ ] higher after 5 in with is in according to current data from the 2 are ] or calcified femoro-popliteal lesions can be with due to higher be considered in the case of or of the to the high in the suitable for the artery should be such as patch or a that the to lesions of the artery also be The of most with not in comparison to the 2 ] arteries should not be in treatment in the stage of intermittent claudication. should be used in the stage of CLTI. with or are not should be used for of a measure if or revascularisation is not from a can be with the of the 2 ] [ ] Critical limb-threatening ischaemia have a data and vascular revascularisation therapy in patients with with to wound and ] [ ] and revascularisation in with vascular in of limb and according to with risk and ] [ ] to the rates of are to higher than of over a of are associated with a higher rate 1 and 3 than after revascularisation with The secondary rate is in with the The current data not a recommendation to be for or in with CLTI. the of for patients must be on in the of the respective such as the of of the or the of the respective must be a circulatory disorder is present with to initial revascularisation should be in to the The of treatment for with critical ischaemia is The treatment is from that of patients with claudication. and interventional therapy have and at these ] [ ] are associated with higher and as well as in the presence of On the other hand, on the there are and lower rates over the long are by lower and more often result in interventional therapy as a first can be in due to the of these and An must be 2 ] In patients with DM, there are on the for interventional treatment of critical ischaemia. In with a ischaemia the of is of particular ] to the of people with DM significantly results in the and the leg rate at each after 1 with a a higher In for people with DM and renal function as well as renal 2 can be used for interventional therapy and as a for to the risk of renal ] [ ] In the treatment of the and femoro-popliteal there is in the to intermittent claudication. The recommendations for cruro-pedal arteries to CLTI. In with is to be as the with should not be is should be In a leg rate of over can be after with this The rate with number of lower leg arteries after data and are for the of arteries after interventional of wound revascularisation can be considered and ] [ ] [ ] limb-threatening ischaemia a circulatory disorder is present with to rapid revascularisation should be in to the The Fontaine and Rutherford in of ischaemia and such as and the presence and of that the risk of amputation are not are not or for people with diabetes. diabetes patients do the of patients with and amputations. The Classification the and to as patients as with increased risk of ] The is not suitable for the risk of also for the of revascularisation as well as for wound and after The of Classification is in the updated guidelines for the of the therapy of 2 ] [ 4 ] In the treatment of the and femoro-popliteal there is in the to intermittent claudication. are for In is to be in In a leg rate of over can be after ] Although a significant of to in in of after 5 the of cannot be ] [ ] of in PAOD in by the of the ] In this of the and the analysis for the arteries evidence of of with the of a to with in the of and of the arteries. This the of and major adverse quality of life at the time after the there a of with of a with with a at time are not for of these The is by analysis of the for the treatment of in which to because of the of significant of for the treatment of ] is the of ] [ ] is in more than of of without ] these procedures the duration of the and the for the and the The that the revascularisation results for diabetic foot are Only the of people with DM significantly results in the and in the leg rates at each after 1 with a a higher ] In for people with DM and renal function as well as renal 2 should be used as a for and interventional therapy for ] amputation rates in patients with DM are significantly of and the that rates are not higher in these patients than in patients without DM.[ ] limb-threatening ischaemia to be and by of or or in with if amputation rates of than with the at duration of than 2 ] [ ] after vascular peripheral vascular the of for secondary is are also for secondary of the This not clinical also significantly the rate and walking The that the of at a of in to significantly the risk of limb-threatening ischaemia, major amputations due to vascular and due to CV disease in patients peripheral vascular procedures or This it the first to examine the of function or in patients after peripheral In patients with increased CV risk or increased risk of should be this in this with the of ] vascular training walking and clinical after revascularisation revascularisation In to are of the therapy The international guidelines on critical leg ischaemia of the for the of and the of published in In the of Diabetes for the of revascularisation as a therapy in a ] [ ] The have in the current S3 in the stage as a for a as to or should be the presence of a vascular life and the of the should also be to patients with PAOD and DM, as the treatment do not An risk with a of and rate of a high risk with a of and rate of ] quality of the from in patients that there significant diabetic patients and patients with to the major amputation and ] This to as well as to appropriate risk the results and In and can be and in patients with due to PAOD with or without DM.[ ] In to the and other for revascularisation are and occlusions after procedures should be in and present for In the presence of in the and revascularisation should be in of the if the quality of the vessels of and is In the artery that allows the most the foot or the should be The for is the should the in to the and and should be considered in is considered a and for occlusive disease In and the rate is with secondary rates of to over with ] of the rates of are with significantly to the ] using rates of and leg rates of at 1 and at 2 have In with the appropriate the rate of foot is to after 3 the leg rate is to after 1 after 3 and after 5 ] should be used if or is suitable is can be with with a secondary rate of a leg rate of and a rate of after 2 without significant to results of ] the artery or the artery is the is In these should be of the is in of 3 and gangrene and amputations can often be and minor In these in the presence of a circulatory and should be published
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rittig et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More from Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes