Examines reliability and validity of the Chinese Precrastination Scale in university students, suggesting it aids time management research.
The present study adapted the Precrastination Scale into Chinese and examined its psychometric properties in a sample of 648 Chinese university students. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses supported a clear unidimensional structure. Parallel analysis confirmed the single-factor solution. The Chinese version demonstrated excellent internal consistency (α = .93, ω = .93) and satisfactory test–retest reliability (ICC = .89). Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis indicated scalar measurement invariance across gender. Criterion-related validity was supported by negative associations with procrastination and positive associations with future time perspective, self-control, and conscientiousness. These findings indicate that the Chinese version of the Precrastination Scale is a reliable and valid instrument. The scale may facilitate future research on action regulation and time management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: