Validation study assesses research readiness in primary care, suggesting improved recruitment and retention strategies.
Introduction: Primary care practice-based research is well positioned to address clinically relevant research questions that can inform real-world practice.However, many practices lack the infrastructure or readiness to participate in research.This study developed and evaluated the Practice Assessment for Research Readiness (PAR2), a survey tool designed to assess research readiness in healthcare systems and community-based primary care practices, including family medicine, pediatrics, and internal medicine. Methods:The PAR2 survey was developed through partner engagement, adapting prior organizational questions, and pilot testing.Six Subscales included: Perceived Value of Research, Capacity for Change, Change Commitment, Change Efficacy, Task Knowledge, and Resource Availability.Cronbach's alphas and composite reliabilities were calculated to assess internal consistency reliability of each subscale.Confirmatory factor analysis was used to assess structural validity.Results: A total of 249 participants from 50 primary care practices completed the PAR2 survey.The internal consistency reliability of each subscale was high (alpha and CR > 0.7) except for the Capacity for Change subscale (CR = 0.77 but alpha = 0.69), which improved (alpha and CR = 0.82) after removing one question due to its low item-total correlation.The scales also showed good structural validity after minor modifications. Conclusions:The PAR2 survey provides a practice-level research specific measure that can be used to align practices with studies suited to their readiness, potentially improving recruitment, reducing attrition and guiding capacity-building interventions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Halladay et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: