Key result
OAT-RCT compares weight-based tinzaparin against weight-stratified enoxaparin after bariatric surgery.
Why the study?
Patients with obesity frequently fail to achieve prophylactic anti-Xa levels with enoxaparin or tinzaparin, and no adequately powered prospective head-to-head randomized trial had compared these agents after bariatric surgery.
Does weight-based tinzaparin improve the achievement of prophylactic anti-Xa levels compared to weight-stratified enoxaparin in adults undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery?
RCT (n=180)
Open-label
1:1 block randomization
No
Does weight-based tinzaparin improve the achievement of prophylactic anti-Xa levels compared to weight-stratified enoxaparin in adults undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery?
This protocol outlines the first adequately powered randomized trial to compare weight-based tinzaparin versus weight-stratified enoxaparin for achieving prophylactic anti-Xa levels in bariatric surgery patients.
Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a recognized and serious complication following bariatric surgery, with the majority of events occurring after hospital discharge. Low-molecular-weight heparin is the most commonly used thromboprophylactic agent in this population. Both enoxaparin and tinzaparin are widely used, but existing evidence suggests a significant proportion of patients with obesity fails to achieve prophylactic anti-Xa levels with either agent. No adequately powered, prospective, head-to-head randomized trial comparing these agents has been conducted in a bariatric surgery population. Methods/Design: The OAT-RCT is a single-center, prospective, open-label, parallel-group randomized controlled trial at St Vincent’s University Hospital, Dublin. Adult patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy or gastric bypass will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive either weight-based tinzaparin (Arm A) or weight-stratified enoxaparin (Arm B) for 21 days post-operatively. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients achieving prophylactic anti-Xa levels (0.2–0.4 IU/mL) at 3–5 hours after the third dose, measured on post-operative day 2. Secondary endpoints include 30-day bleeding events, VTE incidence, sub- and supra-prophylactic anti-Xa proportions, correlations between anti-Xa and body habitus, adverse drug reactions, and patient-reported treatment satisfaction using the validated TSQM-9 questionnaire at 6 weeks. A total of 180 participants (90 per arm) are required based on a formal power calculation. Discussion: The OAT-RCT is the first adequately powered head-to-head randomized controlled trial comparing anti-Xa levels of tinzaparin and enoxaparin for VTE prophylaxis in bariatric surgery. The results will provide high-quality class I evidence to inform evidence-based prescribing guidelines for this rapidly growing surgical population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kennedy et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in Severe obesity requiring bariatric surgery (n=180). Tinzaparin vs. Enoxaparin (40 mg twice daily for ≤150 kg, 60 mg twice daily for >150 kg) was evaluated on Proportion of patients achieving prophylactic anti-Xa levels (0.2–0.4 IU/mL) at 3–5 hours after the third dose on post-operative day 2. The OAT-RCT is a planned randomized controlled trial designed to compare weight-based tinzaparin versus weight-stratified enoxaparin for achieving prophylactic anti-Xa levels following bariatric surgery.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: