Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates effective variance forecasting in financial markets, indicating potential for improved accuracy.
We study one-step-ahead forecasting of daily DAX equity-index variance under an explicit information-availability design. The target is the Rogers–Satchell range-based variance proxy computed from open–high–low–close (OHLC) data, and predictors are daily log returns, with rate changes for yield variables, from a multi-asset panel. Each predictor is represented by a smoothed window curve: The most recent W = 20 W = 20 trading days are mapped through penalized B-splines and evaluated on a common grid, then summarized by functional partial least squares (PLS). The resulting functional variance models are compared with persistence, autoregressive log-variance, heterogeneous autoregressive (HAR), HAR-X(logVIX), an Elastic Net lag-stack benchmark, generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity (GARCH), exponential GARCH (EGARCH), and Glosten–Jagannathan–Runkle GARCH (GJR-GARCH) specifications. All preprocessing and design choices are fixed on the development sample only; recursive fitting, component selection, and Elastic Net penalty selection use only information available at each forecast origin. Final comparisons use a set under the conservative DAX-Close convention, with Global-Close retained as supplementary robustness. Accuracy is evaluated primarily by quasi-likelihood (QLIKE), with mean absolute error (MAE), root mean squared error (RMSE), Diebold–Mariano tests with Newey–West heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent corrections, and moving-block bootstrap intervals as complements. Under DAX-Close , HAR-X(logVIX) has the lowest average QLIKE, followed closely by HAR. The Elastic Net lag-stack ranks third, while fVAR-X(+logv ₜ t ) is the strongest functional specification. The supplementary Global-Close design improves several forecasts but does not change the main interpretation. Recent multi-asset histories are informative, but the smoothed functional representation is competitive rather than dominant in this application.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Çağlar Sözen (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: