The call emphasizes ethical clarity for efficient research priority setting in Australia, promoting community involvement.
In Australia, research priority setting (RPS) may be misclassified as research requiring ethics approval, despite its purpose as a collaborative, pre-research involvement activity. Treating RPS as research creates delays, diverts resources and undermines partnership principles central to inclusive, community-centred priority setting. Recent revisions to the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research clarify that pre-research consultation does not require ethics review, creating an opportunity for consistent national practice. We call for institutions to recognise RPS as involvement and provide proportionate, non-ethics oversight to accelerate RPS and deliver more responsive research agendas that reduce waste.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jenkinson et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: