Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates the role of STUB1 in driving NPM-ALK degradation, suggesting new treatment strategies for ALCL.
The nucleophosmin-anaplastic lymphoma kinase (NPM-ALK) fusion constitutively activates ALK tyrosine kinase, driving oncogenesis in anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL). While arsenic trioxide (ATO) exhibits therapeutic potential, its precise mechanism remains elusive, limiting clinical application. Here, we used a combined approach of E3 ligase library screening, ATO chemical proteomics, and NPM-ALK immunoprecipitation–mass spectrometry to reveal that ATO regulates NPM-ALK stability via the E3 ligase STUB1. Clinically, high STUB1 expression correlates with improved survival, identifying it as a candidate favorable prognostic biomarker in NPM-ALK + ALCL. Mechanistically, ATO promotes a glue‑like interaction that stabilizes the ternary complex of STUB1 and NPM-ALK, promoting ubiquitination at K174 and subsequent proteasomal degradation. Furthermore, structural modeling, domain mapping, and point mutations support a proposed arsenic-dependent interaction model involving STUB1 Cys83, Cys103, and NPM-ALK Cys599, which may modulate the STUB1–NPM-ALK interface and enhance their interaction, thereby promoting ubiquitin-mediated degradation. Crucially, we demonstrate that STUB1 overexpression or pharmacological activation using the FDA-approved cardiac glycoside Deslanoside synergizes profoundly with ATO to inhibit tumor growth both in vitro and in vivo. These findings provide novel mechanistic insight into ATO’s action in NPM-ALK + ALCL and reveal new therapeutic strategies and candidate prognostic biomarkers for patient management. Arsenic trioxide promotes a glue-like interaction through a proposed arsenic-dependent interaction model involving STUB1 and ALK, facilitating K174 ubiquitination and degradation of oncogenic NPM-ALK. High STUB1 expression correlates with favorable survival in NPM-ALK⁺ ALCL, and its pharmacologic activation synergizes with ATO, suggesting a mechanistically precise and clinically actionable degradation strategy
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: