Key result
A risk prediction model for 1-year hospital readmission among young women with AMI, incorporating clinical and gender-related variables, exhibited modest discrimination (AUC = 0.66).
Why the study?
Young women (aged ≤ 55 years) have a higher risk than similarly aged men for 1-year hospital readmission after AMI, but no risk prediction models have been developed specifically for them.
What factors predict 1-year hospital readmission in young women with acute myocardial infarction?
Observational (n=2,007)
What factors predict 1-year hospital readmission in young women with acute myocardial infarction?
A newly developed female-specific risk model for young women with AMI identified clinical and gender-related predictors of 1-year readmission, though its modest discrimination suggests additional unmeasured factors are involved.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not yet change practice given modest discrimination; hypothesis-generating for refined readmission models in young women with AMI.
Background: Although young women ( aged ≤ 55 years) are at higher risk than similarly aged men for hospital readmission within 1 year after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI), no risk prediction models have been developed for them. The present study developed and internally validated a risk prediction model of 1-year post-AMI hospital readmission among young women that considered demographic, clinical, and gender-related variables. Methods: utcomes of Young AMI Patients (VIRGO) study (n = 2007 women), a prospective observational study of young patients hospitalized with AMI. Bayesian model averaging was used for model selection and bootstrapping for internal validation. Model calibration and discrimination were respectively assessed with calibration plots and area under the curve. Results: Within 1-year post-AMI, 684 women (34.1%) were readmitted to the hospital at least once. The final model predictors included: any in-hospital complication, baseline perceived physical health, obstructive coronary artery disease, diabetes, history of congestive heart failure, low income ( < $30,000 US), depressive symptoms, length of hospital stay, and race (White vs Black). Of the 9 retained predictors, 3 were gender-related. The model was well calibrated and exhibited modest discrimination (area under the curve = 0.66). Conclusions: Our female-specific risk model was developed and internally validated in a cohort of young female patients hospitalized with AMI and can be used to predict risk of readmission. Whereas clinical factors were the strongest predictors, the model included several gender-related variables (ie, perceived physical health, depression, income level). However, discrimination was modest, indicating that other unmeasured factors contribute to variability in hospital readmission risk among younger women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dreyer et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Acute Myocardial Infarction (n=2,007). Risk prediction model including clinical and gender-related variables was evaluated on 1-year post-AMI hospital readmission (AUC 0.66). A risk prediction model for 1-year hospital readmission among young women with AMI, incorporating clinical and gender-related variables, exhibited modest discrimination (AUC = 0.66).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: