Establishes a new governance model using biological energy transactions, implying measurable socio-political interactions.
This paper presents the **Ontic Physical Computable Governance Causal Flow Formula** of the **Ontic Regime**, establishing a rigorous physical turn in political theory by redefining socio-political interactions as measurable biological energy transactions between living systems, standardized through the Joule-denominated **Stellar Equivalent (StellarEq)** metric. Within this physically constrained architecture, individual influence is dynamically calculated in real time through a recursively updated Causal Graph via the root equation **Power(t) = Contribution(t) × AdoptionRate(t)**. To systematically prevent capital accumulation, intellectual hoarding, and neo-feudal stagnation, the framework hardcodes **dynamic Causal Edge Weights (EdgeWeightn → i(t)) governed by exponential TimeDecay functions** to naturally dilute historical influence over time. Furthermore, civilizational resilience is cybernetically secured by a dynamic **Civilization Multiplier (CivilizationMultiplier(t)) auditing stability, human empowerment, and cosmic truth-seeking capability**. To bridge this mathematical physics model with practical application, the paper introduces a **38-step algorithmic Power Flow Protocol** designed to construct a foundational pathway that makes building the **Computable Political Language (CPL)** easier in the future. Crucially, to preserve the macro-scale focus on civilizational energy flow, **this paper does not discuss the concrete compilation mechanics of CPL, explicitly omitting its syntax, operational semantics, types, variables, conditions, and state transitions.** Serving as a scalable, protocol-based "Civilization OS," the Ontic model provides a phased, layered transition from subjective ideological power struggles to a physically grounded, empirically auditable, and self-correcting collective intelligence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sum Wan FU (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: