Key result
Lung cancer patients exhibited a significantly higher prevalence of abnormal main pulmonary artery diameter compared to oesophageal cancer patients (males: 35.1% vs 12.5%; females: 32.6% vs 10.7%).
Why the study?
Pulmonary hypertension is an underdiagnosed condition linked to poor survival and post-operative mortality in lung cancer, and CT-based pulmonary artery enlargement parameters strongly predict it.
Is pulmonary artery enlargement more prevalent in lung cancer patients compared to oesophageal cancer patients on routine staging PET/CT?
Observational (n=200)
Is pulmonary artery enlargement more prevalent in lung cancer patients compared to oesophageal cancer patients on routine staging PET/CT?
Routine staging PET/CT reveals a higher prevalence of pulmonary artery enlargement in lung cancer patients compared to oesophageal cancer patients, which may have implications for risk stratification regarding pulmonary hypertension.
May warrant pulmonary hypertension assessment during lung cancer staging; leaves open impact on outcomes and management.
Objective: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is an underdiagnosed condition associated with poor survival and increased post-operative mortality in lung cancer. CT-based parameters of pulmonary artery enlargement are strong predictors of PH. We used these parameters to investigate pulmonary artery enlargement in lung and oesophageal cancer. Methods: Consecutive patients with lung cancer (n = 100) or oesophageal cancer (n = 100) undergoing staging 18F-fluodeoxyglucose PET/CT were retrospectively identified. The transverse diameter of the main pulmonary artery (mPA) and ascending aorta, and the pulmonary artery-to-ascending aorta (PA:A) ratio were obtained. Abnormal values were defined following the Framingham Heart Study cohort. Results: Lung cancer patients had a significantly increased mPA diameter compared to the oesophageal cancer patients (males: 27.29 ± 0.39 vs. 25.88 ± 0.24 mm, females: 26.10 ± 0.28 vs. 24.45 ± 0.18 mm). Similarly, a significantly increased proportion of these patients had an abnormal mPA diameter (males: 35.1% vs 12.5%, females: 32.6% vs 10.7%). Lung cancer patients also had a significantly higher PA:A ratio (males: 0.83 ± 0.01 vs. 0.79 ± 0.008, females: 0.85 ± 0.01 vs. 0.79 ± 0.009), with a larger proportion having an abnormal PA:A ratio (males: 24.6% vs 11.1%, females: 27.9% vs 14.3%). Conclusion: Simple measurements of mPA diameter and PA:A ratio reveal that lung cancer patients exhibit increased rates of pulmonary artery enlargement compared to oesophageal cancer patients. Advances in knowledge: This study demonstrates there is an increased prevalence of pulmonary enlargement in lung cancer, easily detected on routine staging scans, holding implications for further work-up and risk stratification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ji‐Xu et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Lung and oesophageal cancer (n=200). Lung cancer vs. Oesophageal cancer was evaluated on Main pulmonary artery (mPA) diameter and pulmonary artery-to-ascending aorta (PA:A) ratio. Lung cancer patients exhibited a significantly higher prevalence of abnormal main pulmonary artery diameter compared to oesophageal cancer patients (males: 35.1% vs 12.5%; females: 32.6% vs 10.7%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: