Key result
The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol significantly reduced length of stay (MD -2.82; 95% CI -3.79 to -1.85; p<0.00001) and grade III/IV complications (RR 0.60; 95% CI 0.41 to 0.87).
Why the study?
CRS and HIPEC is a promising approach for peritoneal carcinomatosis but carries significant morbidity and prolonged hospital stay, prompting evaluation of the ERAS protocol.
Does the ERAS protocol reduce length of stay and early complications in patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC for peritoneal carcinomatosis?
Meta-Analysis
Does the ERAS protocol reduce length of stay and early complications in patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC for peritoneal carcinomatosis?
The ERAS protocol is associated with reduced length of stay and lower incidence of severe complications in patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports ERAS adoption in CRS/HIPEC; extends Level 1 evidence to peritoneal carcinomatosis surgery.
Background: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is a promising approach for the management of peritoneal carcinomatosis, but is associated with significant morbidity and prolonged hospital stay. Herein, we review the impact of Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol on length of stay (LOS) and early complications in patients undergoing CRS and HIPEC for peritoneal carcinomatosis. Methods: PubMed and Embase were searched for studies comparing ERAS protocol with control for CRS + HIPEC. Mean difference (MD) and risk ratios (RR) were calculated for LOS and complications respectively. Results: Six retrospective studies were included. Meta-analysis indicated statistically significant reduction in LOS with ERAS (MD: −2.82 95% CI: −3.79, −1.85 I 2 = 29% p < 0.00001). Our results demonstrated significantly reduced risk of Calvien Dindo grade III/IV complications with the use of ERAS protocol as compared to the control group (RR: 0.60 95% CI: 0.41, 0.87 I 2 = 0% p = 0.007). Pooled analysis of limited studies demonstrated no statistically significant difference in the risk of reoperation (RR: 1.04 95% CI: 0.54, 2.03 I 2 = 50% p = 0.90) readmission (RR: 0.55 95% CI: 0.21, 1.49 I 2 = 0% p = 0.24), acute kidney injury (RR: 0.55 95% CI: 0.28, 1.10 I 2 = 0% p = 0.09) or mortality (RR: 0.62 95% CI: 0.17, 2.26 I 2 = 0% p = 0.46) between the study groups. Conclusion: For CRS + HIPEC, ERAS is associated with significantly reduced LOS along with lower incidence of complications. Limited data suggest that use of ERAS protocol is not associated with increased readmission, reoperation, and mortality rates in these patients. There is a need for randomized controlled trials to corroborate the current evidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mao et al. (2021) conducted a meta-analysis in Peritoneal carcinomatosis. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol vs. Control was evaluated on Length of stay (LOS) (MD -2.82, 95% CI -3.79 to -1.85, p=< 0.00001). The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol significantly reduced length of stay (MD -2.82; 95% CI -3.79 to -1.85; p<0.00001) and grade III/IV complications (RR 0.60; 95% CI 0.41 to 0.87).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: