Neuroscience has been proposed for use in the legal system for purposes of mind reading, assessment of responsibility, and prediction of misconduct. Each of these uses has both promises and perils, and each raises issues regarding the admissibility of neuroscientific evidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nadelhoffer et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: