Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction CT is the primary modality for kidney pathology, but deep-learning evaluation is undermined by slice-level leakage and poor probability calibration. Methods A patient-disjoint, group-stratified hold-out benchmark is established for four-class kidney CT classification (Normal, Cyst, Tumor, Stone) on a 12,446-image multicenter cohort, and NephroNet — a compact (1.46 M-parameter) depthwise-separable CNN with squeeze-and-excitation and a light SpatialGate —b is proposed. A standardized pipeline (320 × 320 preprocessing; annealed MixUp/CutMix; class-weighted AdamW with warmup-cosine; EMA-only evaluation; TTA; post-hoc temperature scaling, T * = 1.42) is reported across accuracy, per-class and micro/macro ROC-AUC, Brier score, and ECE with bootstrap CIs. Results On the hold-out ( N = 2,490), NephroNet attains accuracy 0.9997 (95% CI 0.9984–1.0000), macro-AUC 0.9969 (0.9953–0.9983), Brier 0.0007, ECE 0.0021, surpassing budget-matched CNN and transformer baselines. Discussion Transparent splits, explicit capacity control, and calibration-aware reporting support reproducible comparison; all data are single-region, so external and prospective validation is required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: