Key result
Severe tricuspid aortic stenosis was associated with similar coronary ostial locations compared to controls (LCO 15.5 vs 14.9 mm, P=0.18) but significantly larger aortic root dimensions (P<0.01).
Why the study?
Are aortic root dimensions and coronary ostial locations altered in patients with severe tricuspid aortic stenosis compared to normal subjects?
Case-Control (n=200)
Are aortic root dimensions and coronary ostial locations altered in patients with severe tricuspid aortic stenosis compared to normal subjects?
Absolute Event Rate: 15.5% vs 14.9%
p-value: p=0.18
Severe tricuspid aortic stenosis is associated with transverse remodeling and dilatation of the aortic root, emphasizing the need for pre-procedural CT before TAVI.
CT evaluation of variable ostial heights and root dilatation in severe AS supports individualized TAVI planning; leaves open outcome impact.
Detailed knowledge of aortic root geometry is a prerequisite to anticipate complications of transcatheter aortic valve (TAV) implantation. We determined coronary ostial locations and aortic root dimensions in patients with aortic stenosis (AS) and compared these values with normal subjects using computed tomography (CT). One hundred consecutive patients with severe tricuspid AS and 100 consecutive patients without valvular pathology (referred to as the controls) undergoing cardiac dual-source CT were included. Distances from the aortic annulus (AA) to the left coronary ostium (LCO), right coronary ostium (RCO), the height of the left coronary sinus (HLS), right coronary sinus (HRS), and aortic root dimensions [diameters of AA, sinus of Valsalva (SV), and sino-tubular junction (STJ)] were measured. LCO and RCO were 14.9 +/- 3.2 mm (8.2-25.9) and 16.8 +/- 3.6 mm (12.0-25.7) in the controls, 15.5 +/- 2.9 mm (8.8-24.3) and 17.3 +/- 3.6 mm (7.3-26.0) in patients with AS. Controls and patients with AS had similar values for LCO (P = 0.18), RCO (P = 0.33) and HLS (P = 0.88), whereas HRS (P < 0.05) was significantly larger in patients with AS. AA (r = 0.55,P < 0.001), SV (r = 0.54,P < 0.001), and STJ (r = 0.52,P < 0.001) significantly correlated with the body surface area in the controls; whereas no correlation was found in patients with AS. Patients with AS had significantly larger AA (P < 0.01) and STJ (P < 0.01) diameters when compared with the controls. In patients with severe tricuspid AS, coronary ostial locations were similar to the controls, but a transverse remodelling of the aortic root was recognized. Owing to the large distribution of ostial locations and the dilatation of the aortic root, CT is recommended before TAV implantation in each patient.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stolzmann et al. (2009) conducted a case-control in Severe tricuspid aortic stenosis (n=200). Severe tricuspid aortic stenosis vs. Patients without valvular pathology was evaluated on Distance from the aortic annulus to the left coronary ostium (LCO) (p=0.18). Severe tricuspid aortic stenosis was associated with similar coronary ostial locations compared to controls (LCO 15.5 vs 14.9 mm, P=0.18) but significantly larger aortic root dimensions (P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: