Key result
Younger age (HR 2.81; 95% CI 2.45-3.22), male gender, and lower ejection fraction were independent predictors of receiving sacubitril/valsartan in a Swedish national heart failure cohort.
Why the study?
The study aimed to investigate the introduction of sacubitril/valsartan in Sweden regarding regional differences, clinical characteristics, titration patterns, and determinants of use and discontinuation.
What are the clinical characteristics, titration patterns, and determinants of sacubitril/valsartan use in a real-world Swedish heart failure cohort?
Cohort (n=2,037)
Yes
What are the clinical characteristics, titration patterns, and determinants of sacubitril/valsartan use in a real-world Swedish heart failure cohort?
Hazard Ratio: 2.81 (95% CI 2.45–3.22)
Real-world implementation of sacubitril/valsartan in Sweden was slow and varied regionally, with younger, male patients with ischemic heart disease and lower ejection fraction more likely to receive it, though treatment persistence was high.
Slow sac/val uptake with 5-fold regional variation signals implementation gaps; leaves open determinants of equitable HF therapy access.
AIMS: The aim of this study is to study the introduction of sacubitril/valsartan (sac/val) in Sweden with regards to regional differences, clinical characteristics, titration patterns, and determinants of use and discontinuation. METHODS AND RESULTS: A national cohort of heart failure was defined from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register and National Patient Register. A subcohort with additional data from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry (SwedeHF) was also studied. Cohorts were subdivided as per sac/val prescription and registration in SwedeHF. Median sac/val prescription rate was 20 per 100 000 inhabitants. Between April 2016 and December 2017, we identified 2037 patients with ≥1 sac/val prescription, of which 1144 (56%) were registered in SwedeHF. Overall, patients prescribed with sac/val were younger, more frequently male, and had less prior cardiovascular disease than non-sac/val patients. In SwedeHF subcohort, patients prescribed with sac/val had lower ejection fraction. Overall, younger age [hazard ratio 2.81 (95% confidence interval 2.45-3.22)], registration in SwedeHF [1.97 (1.83-2.12)], male gender [1.50 (1.37-1.64)], ischaemic heart disease [1.50 (1.39-1.62)], lower left ventricular ejection fraction [3.06 (2.18-4.31)], and New York Heart Association IV [1.50 (1.22-1.84)] were predictors for sac/val use. As initiation dose in the sac/val cohort, 38% received 24/26 mg, 54% 49/51 mg, and 9% 97/103 mg. Up-titration to the target dose was achieved in 57% of the overall cohort over a median follow-up of 6 months. The estimated treatment persistence for any dose at 360 days was 82%. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of sac/val in Sweden was slow and varied five-fold across different regions; younger age, male, SwedeHF registration, and ischaemic heart disease were among the independent predictors of receiving sac/val. Overall, treatment persistence and tolerability was high.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fu et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Heart failure (n=2,037). Sacubitril/valsartan vs. Non-sacubitril/valsartan patients was evaluated on Sacubitril/valsartan use (predicted by younger age) (HR 2.81, 95% CI 2.45-3.22). Younger age (HR 2.81; 95% CI 2.45-3.22), male gender, and lower ejection fraction were independent predictors of receiving sacubitril/valsartan in a Swedish national heart failure cohort.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: