In the design of new waste‐management facilities, or in the remedial design for contaminated facilities, there are economic tradeoffs possible between the resources assigned to site investigation, facility design, and site monitoring. Hydrogeological decision analysis provides a framework that allows a sequential, iterative approach to design, in which data acquisition through site investigation alternates with economic analysis of alternative design options. In this framework, the purpose of collecting hydrogeological data is to aid in the making of decisions between the alternative design options. Such decisions are made on the basis of a risk‐cost‐benefit objective function. Additional measurements have worth only if the risk reduction they provide exceeds the cost of obtaining them. The location of measurement points in a site‐investigation network should minimize economic regret with respect to design decisions. This paper provides an introduction to the concepts of data‐worth analysis for two cases: (1) the reduction of uncertainty in aquitard continuity, and (2) the reduction of uncertainty in hydraulic‐conductivity distribution in an aquifer. It is shown how the use of search theory and Bayesian updating can be applied in comparing prior and preposterior analyses to provide a stopping rule for the collection of additional data in site investigation programs at a hypothetical landfill site.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Freeze et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: