Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The purpose of this work is to create a digital map of surface-effervescing soils based on space imagery and field research data; and to compare soil mapping procedure using remote and ground-based methods. The research was carried out at the Oroshaemaya experimental station (Volgograd Oblast) located in the south of the Volga Upland. The soil cover is represented by light-chestnut (Kastanozems) and solonetz microassociations on arable and irrigated lands. The article traces all stages of creating a digital map based on space images and field research in 2020–2023. Field studies included route work to assess the intensity (class) of effervescence with 10% HCl at the soil surface. Based on the relationship between the spectral characteristics of the open soil surface in high-resolution Pleiades satellite imagery (April 25, 2020) and the intensity of soil effervescence, the raster space images were classified into 4 classes separately for 26 fields using the Random Forest algorithm. The following layers were created from the raster: (1) vector layers of field boundaries with the calculation of the proportion of effervescent soils of different classes in the field; (2) vector layers of polygons inside the fields with different proportions of different classes. To vectorize the polygons of surface-effervescing soils, the QGIS program and functions were used. Estimates of the proportion of effervescing soils within the field obtained only by a ground survey and estimates based on a digital map created by vectorization of the raster classified by the Random Forest algorithm are comparable to each other with a determination coefficient of 0.68–0.83. A digital vector map of polygons, created using a model that links remote sensing data and ground-based sampling data, allows us to determine specific parameters of the soil cover pattern based on the presence of surface-effervescing soils and to assess the anthropogenic transformation of the soil cover using the previously proposed indicator.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Горохова et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: