Purpose: This paper investigates the increased mass-marketing in the fair trade industry to provide a robust analysis of the industry, participants and growth for use as both a starting point for researchers in this field and as a case study for readers with an interest in any ethical trading initiative : Utilising data from a longitudinal exploratory research project, participant observation from two organisations and in-depth interviews from a total of 15 organisations are combined to build strong theory grounded in the data. : The paper provides insight into the nature of participants and industry structure in fair trade over time. Four distinct eras are identified which reflect both current literature and the practitioners’ perspective. The four eras can be split into 3 extant eras - the solidarity era, niche-market era and mass-market era, and the fourth - the institutionalisation era – depicts participants’ beliefs about the future for the industry. implications: The three principle theoretical contributions are the definitions which are provided for the different eras of the market’s progression, the view of industry structure and the newly defined participants from both the commodity and under-considered craft markets. implications: Practical contributions are provided since the paper offers a holistic view of the fair trade market, so acting as a starting point for those new to fair trade. /Value: This paper provides deep empirically grounded theory from which fair trade research can grow. It also provides future insights from participants in the industry advancing current theory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Iain Davies (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: