Key result
A two-week sprint interval training intervention reduced insulin-stimulated brain glucose uptake in global cortical grey matter by 12% (p=0.03) in sedentary subjects with insulin resistance.
Why the study?
Does short-term sprint interval training alter brain glucose metabolism in sedentary subjects with insulin resistance?
RCT (n=21)
randomized
Does short-term sprint interval training alter brain glucose metabolism in sedentary subjects with insulin resistance?
p-value: p=0.03
Short-term sprint interval training, but not moderate intensity continuous training, effectively decreases insulin-stimulated brain glucose uptake in sedentary subjects with insulin resistance.
Should not change practice; leaves open whether sprint training alters brain metabolism or warrants trials in insulin resistance.
Brain insulin-stimulated glucose uptake (GU) is increased in obese and insulin resistant subjects but normalizes after weight loss along with improved whole-body insulin sensitivity. Our aim was to study whether short-term exercise training (moderate intensity continuous training (MICT) or sprint interval training (SIT)) alters substrates for brain energy metabolism in insulin resistance. Sedentary subjects ( n = 21, BMI 23.7–34.3 kg/m 2 , age 43–55 y) with insulin resistance were randomized into MICT ( n = 11, intensity≥60% of VO 2peak ) or SIT ( n = 10, all-out) groups for a two-week training intervention. Brain GU during insulin stimulation and fasting brain free fatty acid uptake (FAU) was measured using PET. At baseline, brain GU was positively associated with the fasting insulin level and negatively with the whole-body insulin sensitivity. The whole-body insulin sensitivity improved with both training modes (20%, p = 0.007), while only SIT led to an increase in aerobic capacity (5%, p = 0.03). SIT also reduced insulin-stimulated brain GU both in global cortical grey matter uptake (12%, p = 0.03) and in specific regions ( p < 0.05, all areas except the occipital cortex), whereas no changes were observed after MICT. Brain FAU remained unchanged after the training in both groups. These findings show that short-term SIT effectively decreases insulin-stimulated brain GU in sedentary subjects with insulin resistance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Honkala et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in insulin resistance (n=21). Sprint interval training (SIT) vs. Moderate intensity continuous training (MICT) was evaluated on Insulin-stimulated brain glucose uptake (GU) (p=0.03). A two-week sprint interval training intervention reduced insulin-stimulated brain glucose uptake in global cortical grey matter by 12% (p=0.03) in sedentary subjects with insulin resistance.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: