Research Article| December 01, 1995 Patterns of thermal maturity as diagnostic criteria for interpretation of melanges Daniel L. Orange; Daniel L. Orange 1Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, 160 Central Avenue, Pacific Grove, California 93950 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Michael B. Underwood Michael B. Underwood 2Department of Geological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Geology (1995) 23 (12): 1144–1148. https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1995)023<1144:POTMAD>2.3.CO;2 Article history first online: 02 Jun 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Daniel L. Orange, Michael B. Underwood; Patterns of thermal maturity as diagnostic criteria for interpretation of melanges. Geology 1995;; 23 (12): 1144–1148. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1995)023<1144:POTMAD>2.3.CO;2 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGeology Search Advanced Search Abstract Melanges are common constituents of ancient subduction complexes. Interpretations of melange genesis fall into five general categories: (1) gravitationally induced lateral spreading of the slope apron; (2) large-scale mass wasting (olistostromes); (3) subduction-driven viscous flow within "channels" at the base of the accretionary wedge; (4) diapiric injection; and (5) tectonic deformation within shear zones. interpretations are more viable when thermal-maturity data are considered along with structural and stratigraphic aspects. To document each distinct type of thermal-maturity signature, paleotemperature data must be extracted from both the matrix lithologies and the blocks of sedimentary rock within a melange, as well as from surrounding formations or structural domains. This content is PDF only. Please click on the PDF icon to access. First Page Preview Close Modal You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Orange et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: