Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To limit the rapid spread of COVID-19, most governments have introduced different non-pharmaceutical interventions, which might have severe costs for society. Therefore, it is crucial to evaluate the most cost-effective interventions, using, for instance, Bayesian modelling. Such modelling efforts have deemed lockdown to account for 81% of the reduction in R 0 , contributing to government policies. Here, we show that these conclusions are unsupported and that policies therefore should not be based on these studies. https://www.eurosurveillance.org/for-authors
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bryant et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: