Key result
Greater activity limitation was inversely associated with patient activation, with self-care efficacy decreasing by 0.17 to 0.60 across mild to complete limitation stages compared to no limitation.
Why the study?
Are higher activity of daily living and instrumental activity of daily living stages associated with lower levels of patient activation in community-dwelling older adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=8,981)
Are higher activity of daily living and instrumental activity of daily living stages associated with lower levels of patient activation in community-dwelling older adults?
Greater physical impairment in older adults is associated with lower patient activation, highlighting the need for targeted support in this population.
ADL/IADL stages may aid risk stratification; hypothesis-generating for patient activation associations in cross-sectional data.
OBJECTIVES: Activity of daily living stages and instrumental activity of daily living stages demonstrated ordered associations with mortality, risk of hospitalization, and receipt of recommended care. This article explores the associations of stages with the following three dimensions of patient activation: self-care efficacy, patient-doctor communication, and health-information seeking. We hypothesized that higher activity of daily living and instrumental activity of daily living stages (greater limitation) are associated with a lower level of patient activation. METHODS: Patient activation factors were derived from the 2004 and 2009 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey. In this cross-sectional study (N = 8981), the associations of activity limitation stages with patient activation factors were assessed in latent factor models. RESULTS: Greater activity limitation was in general inversely associated with self-efficacy, patient-doctor communication, and health information seeking, even after adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. For instance, the mean of self-care efficacy across activity of daily living stages I-IV (mild, moderate, severe, and complete limitation) compared with stage 0 (no limitation) decreased significantly by 0.17, 0.29, 0.34, and 0.60, respectively. Covariates associated with suboptimal patient activation were also identified. DISCUSSION: Our study identified multiple opportunities to improve patient activation, including providing support for older adults with physical impairments, at socioeconomic disadvantages, or with psychological or cognitive impairment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Na et al. (2018) conducted a cross-sectional in Community-dwelling older adults (n=8,981). Activity limitation (activity of daily living stages) vs. No limitation (stage 0) was evaluated on Patient activation (self-care efficacy, patient-doctor communication, and health-information seeking) (Mean decrease of 0.17, 0.29, 0.34, and 0.60). Greater activity limitation was inversely associated with patient activation, with self-care efficacy decreasing by 0.17 to 0.60 across mild to complete limitation stages compared to no limitation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: