Four methods to compute the dielectric permittivity ε of a liquid from molecular simulations are compared in the context of the simple point charge (SPC) water model. In the first method (unrestrained method), ε is evaluated from the fluctuations of the box dipole moment M, monitored during a single equilibrium simulation. In the three other methods, ε is evaluated from the probability distribution p(M) of the dipole moment norm. This distribution is itself evaluated in three different ways: (i) from multiple simulations involving a M-dependent biasing potential (umbrella-sampling method), (ii) from multiple simulations involving a constrained dipole moment norm (M-constraint method), or (iii) from fitting of incomplete p(M) estimates to a Maxwell distribution (fitting method). The four methods are shown to converge to an identical estimate of ε=61±1 for SPC water (256 molecules, reaction-field electrostatics). The convergence properties, advantages, and drawbacks of the different methods are analyzed in detail.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Heinz et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: