Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
meso -α,α,α,α-Tetrakis(2-hydroxy-1-naphthyl)porphyrin ( 1 ) and 5,15- cis -bis(2-hydroxy-1-naphthyl)-10,20-diphenylporphyrin ( 2 ) were prepared as receptors for ubiquinone analogues. UV−vis, IR, NMR, and X-ray crystal data reveal that these porphyrins bind a series of quinones with a cofacial structure linked by hydrogen bonds. The binding constants of 1 for quinones increase with the number of MeO substituents bound to a quinone ring. Compared to 2,5-dimethoxy- p -benzoquinone, 2,3-dimethoxy- p -benzoquinone shows more favorable negative changes in Δ G ° and Δ H ° upon binding with 1, whereas the interaction between 2 and quinone is not affected by the position and number of MeO substituents. Thus the two adjacent MeO substituents cooperatively act as the third recognition site for OH groups in 1 to form the bifurcated hydrogen bonding. Particularly, tetramethoxy- p -benzoquinone ( 4f ) shows an extremely large affinity and favorable Δ H ° with 1 due to the formation of simultaneous multiple hydrogen bonds; Δ G ° = −7.9 kcal/mol at 298 K in toluene. The van't Hoff plots obtained from titrimetric measurement at 0.9−5.2 mol % ethanol in toluene reveal a nonlinear relationship between R ln K and 1/ T . The curvature of these plots is explained in terms of the temperature dependence of the degree of functional groups solvation in 1 and 4f with a negative heat capacity change; Δ C p ° = −5.6 × 10 2 cal/mol·K at 0.9 mol % ethanol, indicating that the solvent−solute interaction has a crucial effect on the stability of the host−guest complexes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hayashi et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: