According to the celebrated Bolgiano–Obukhov (Bolgiano, J. Geophys. Res. , vol. 64 (12), 1959, pp. 2226–2229; Obukhov, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR , vol. 125, 1959, p. 1246) phenomenology for moderately stably stratified turbulence, the energy spectrum in the inertial range shows a dual scaling: the kinetic energy follows (i) ~k-11/5 for k<kB , and (ii) ~k-5/3 for k>kB , where kB is the Bolgiano wavenumber. The k-5/3 scaling, akin to passive scalar turbulence, is a direct consequence of the assumption that buoyancy is insignificant for k>kB . We revisit this assumption, and using the constancy of kinetic and potential energy fluxes and simple theoretical analysis, we find that the k-5/3 spectrum is absent. This is because the velocity field at small scales is too weak to establish a constant kinetic energy flux as in passive scalar turbulence. A quantitative condition for the existence of the second regime is also derived in the paper.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alam et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: