Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A final solution must be selected from a set of Pareto optimal solutions in the end when a multiobjective optimization problem is solved. Such selection becomes much more complicated for systems engineering when it involves multiple decision makers (DMs). This article proposes a weight induced norm (WIN) approach to group decision making from a systems engineering perspective. The importance of DMs and their preferences on objectives are associated with weighting coefficients using existing transformations. The weights are used to define a norm, introducing the concept of distance. Solution quality is assessed in the objective space. The final solution is the one that corresponds with the vector closest to a normalized ideal vector. Theoretical analysis is conducted to show a number of superior features of the WIN approach: backward compatibility, weighted-sum equivalence, Pareto compliance, invariability in normalization, and pairwise consistency. Numerical analysis illustrates that the WIN approach can produce a final solution reflecting the DMs' importance and their preferences adequately; the WIN approach to solution selection can be interpreted using geometrical or algebraic arguments, which facilitates the DMs' understanding of the decision process; it can readily distinguish the best solution from the remaining ones to avoid ambiguity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chiu et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: