Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demand-side management (DSM) is increasingly recognised as an important enabler of building flexibility, yet its contribution to Smart Readiness Indicator (SRI) outcomes remains insufficiently quantified. This study examines how DSM-enabled services are represented within the SRI framework and how they affect both overall smart-readiness performance and the “Energy flexibility and storage” functionality. A structured mapping of DSM-enabled services within the SRI catalogue was combined with a simulation-based case study of an existing public-use building. Of the 54 SRI services, 23 were identified as directly enabling DSM capabilities. These services were analysed through cumulative activation, staged adoption scenarios, cost-weighted pathway comparison, and service-level decomposition. Activation of all DSM-enabled services at their highest DSM-relevant functional levels increased the SRI score from 43.0% to 80.6%, while the Grid-related functionality rose from 15.0% to 100.0%. The results show a non-linear response to staged DSM adoption and a concentrated distribution of effects. Heating-domain services provide the largest individual contributions, while Monitoring and Control services play a key enabling role through coordination and reporting. Cost-weighted comparison indicates that digitally oriented pathways are strongest in SRI-oriented efficiency terms, whereas thermally anchored pathways are particularly relevant for stronger Grid-related gains. The findings confirm that the SRI is structurally sensitive to DSM-enabled flexibility, while remaining a capability-oriented indicator of readiness rather than realised operational performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Węglarz et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: