A wide range of heterogeneous specimen designs has been proposed for the inverse calibration of anisotropic elastoplastic models, yet a consistent framework to quantitatively evaluate and compare their performance remains lacking. This study presents a performance indicator for the systematic evaluation and design of heterogeneous mechanical tests aimed at the inverse calibration of anisotropic metal plasticity models. The indicator integrates two fundamental criteria: load state diversity, which quantifies the richness of the strain space via convex hull analysis; and measurement efficiency, which assesses the spatial compactness of high-value plastic regions relevant to Digital Image Correlation. The formulation operates on strain data in a global coordinate system and is applicable to both two-dimensional and three-dimensional specimens. It can also account for material symmetry, tailoring its application to any form of anisotropy. Application of the indicator to ten 2D geometries revealed a clear ranking of designs according to their strain diversity and experimental practicality, while its use in optimization led to the development of a 3D curved-beam specimen exhibiting several orders of magnitude higher load state diversity and twice the efficiency of planar counterparts. Experimental validation using a multi-view stereo-DIC system is performed to confirm the generation of rich heterogeneous strain fields that can facilitate inverse calibration of constitutive models. The framework provides a unified and practical methodology for integrating strain-space analysis, shape optimization, and experimental testing in the context of anisotropic elastoplastic constitutive model calibration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Emami et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: