Key result
Surrogate objective measures including operative time, morbidity, and reoperation were significant predictors of work relative value units for otolaryngologic procedures, explaining 60% of the variation.
Why the study?
The determination of accurate measures for evaluating surgeon work for reimbursement is poorly characterized.
Observational (n=41,554)
Yes
Using objective surrogate measures such as operative time, morbidity, and reoperation rates may improve the accuracy of work RVU assignments in head and neck surgery compared to the current subjective physician survey system.
Objective measures associate with otolaryngology work RVUs; leaves open their role in refining reimbursement valuations.
Background: The determination of accurate measures of evaluating surgeon work for reimbursement is poorly characterized. This study defines the correlation of surgical work relative value units (work RVUs) with several surrogate objective measures for otolaryngologic work. The defined surrogate objective measures evaluated in this study are length of hospital stay (LOS), operative time, 30-day mortality, 30-day unplanned readmission, 30-day reoperation, and 30-day morbidity. Methods: We collected data on otolaryngologic cases from 2016 to 2018 from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to associate work RVUs with objective measures of surgeon work. Linear regressions were used to identify predictors of work RVUs from the surrogate objective measures. Studentized residuals were used to identify outlying procedures. Results: Work RVUs correlated strongly with operative time (R=0.6775), 30-day readmission (R=0.6100), and LOS (R=0.6083); moderately with 30-day reoperation (R=0.5257) and 30-day morbidity (R=0.4842); and very weakly with 30-day mortality (R=0.1383). The best predictors for work RVUs based on multivariable linear regression analysis were morbidity, reoperation, and operative time. Analysis revealed that the projected work RVU is 12.23 units higher than the current value for excision of bone, mandible (Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] code 21025) and 19.48 units lower than the current value for resection/excision of lesion infratemporal fossa space apex extradural (CPT code 61605). Conclusion: Using objective surrogate measures for time and intensity of physician work in head and neck cases may improve work RVU assignment accuracy compared to the current system of physician survey. Future investigation with additional objective parameters may be beneficial to make work RVU assignments less subjective.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramsey et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Otolaryngologic (head and neck) surgical cases (n=41,554). Surrogate objective measures (operative time, morbidity, reoperation) was evaluated on Work RVU increase per minute of operative time (multivariable linear regression) (0.0973 units, 95% CI 0.0619 to 0.1327, p=<0.001). Surrogate objective measures including operative time, morbidity, and reoperation were significant predictors of work relative value units for otolaryngologic procedures, explaining 60% of the variation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: