The $4f$ ionization potentials for mercury in the vapor phase have been measured relative to the vacuum level; those for mercury condensed on gold, silver, and copper have been measured relative to the Fermi level. Correction for the work function of the solids, determined in a separate experiment, gives the ionization potentials of the condensed mercury relative to the vacuum. The vapor-phase ionization potentials are greater than those for condensed phases by 3.3 eV for f7/2 electrons and 3.0 eV for f5/2 electrons; these differences are nearly independent of the substrate. This shift is attributed to extra-atomic relaxation energies. Two models, a localized electron (exciton) model and an equivalent-cores thermochemical model, predict relaxation energies for these and other systems with reasonable accuracy. The splitting between the f7/2 and f5/2 levels is 4.01 eV in the gas phase and 3.7 eV in the solid phase. The change in splitting on condensation may be due to energy-loss phenomena peculiar to the surface.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jen et al. (1976) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: