Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Fibrous polynucleotide duplexes are very polymorphic. Detailed x-ray analysis of the D forms of poly d(AT) ·poly d(AT) and poly d(IC) ·poly d(IC) and of the B form of poly d(GC) ·poly d(GC) show that 5′RpY3′ dinucleoside monophosphates in these molecules have either t,t or t,g conformations at C3′–03′, 03′-P which lead to similar orientations of phosphate groups. On the other hand, 5′YpR3′ fragments commonly have g,t conformations and hence a markedly different orientation of the phosphate group. Studies of the more complex structures of the C form of poly d(ACC) ·poly d(GGT) and of a pleiomeric D form of poly d(AT) ·poly d(AT) where the repeated structural motifs are hexanucleotides reveal further details of the surface “wrinkles” on DNA. In the case of the H form of poly d(A) ·poly d(T), the sugar rings in each strand are puckered differently-C2′-endo in poly d(T) and C3′-endo in poly d(A). Such heteromerous duplexes have unusually pronounced directional properties. Similar structure ma be present in some DNA-RNA hybrids. These surface feature might enable regulatory proteins and enzymes to recognize their host DNA sequences more easily in the blinding process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chandrasekaran et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: