Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Europe has somewhere between 150,000 and 500,000 landfill sites, with an estimat-ed 90% of them being “non-sanitary” landfills, predating the EU Landfill Directive of 1999/31/EC. These older landfills tend to be filled with municipal solid waste and often lack any environmental protection technology. “Doing nothing”, state-of-the-art aftercare or remediating them depends largely on technical, societal and eco-nomic conditions which vary between countries. Beside “doing nothing” and land-fill aftercare, there are different scenarios in landfill mining, from re-landfilling the waste into “sanitary landfills” to seizing the opportunity for a combined resource-re-covery and remediation strategy. This review article addresses present and future issues and potential opportunities for landfill mining as an embedded strategy in current waste management systems through a multi-disciplinary approach. In par-ticular, three general landfill mining strategies are addressed with varying extents of resource recovery. These are discussed in relation to the main targets of land-fill mining: (i) reduction of the landfill volume (technical), (ii) reduction of risks and impacts (environmental) and (iii) increase in resource recovery and overall profit-ability (economic). Geophysical methods could be used to determine the charac-teristics of the landfilled waste and subsurface structures without the need of an invasive exploration, which could greatly reduce exploration costs and time, as well as be useful to develop a procedure to either discard or select the most ap-propriate sites for (E)LFM. Material and energy recovery from landfilled waste can be achieved through mechanical processing coupled with thermochemical valori-zation technologies and residues upcycling techniques. Gasification could enable the upcycling of residues after thermal treatment into a new range of eco-friendly construction materials based on inorganic polymers and glass-ceramics. The mul-ti-criteria assessment is directly influenced by waste- and technology related fac-tors, which together with site-specific conditions, market and regulatory aspects, influence the environmental, economic and societal impacts of (E)LFM projects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Parrodi et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: