Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Mapping residual compliance work for the EU AI Act indicates significant areas for improvement in AI governance frameworks.
Mapping residual EU AI Act compliance work after leading AI governance frameworks. Compares a multi-ISO stack (ISO/IEC 42001 and companions, including ISO 37301), IAPP AIGP and CIPP/E, and the NIST AI RMF (with generative-AI profile). By article-normalized weight, about 58% of the Act is public/institutional machinery; of the company-facing remainder, about 78% is product residual and about 22% is management-system / AI-governance work. On that MS/gov share, multi-ISO is the main structural approach for about 60% and reaches cumulative coverage of about 96%. Not legal advice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Igor Razumny (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: