Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates the effect of supercritical CO2 on gasification efficiency in coal, suggesting enhanced reactivity.
Developing deep coal resources is often hindered by technical challenges and low chemical reactivity. Underground coal gasification, a key approach for exploiting medium to deep coal seams, suffers from low reaction efficiency. In this study, the regulatory mechanism of supercritical CO 2 pre-treatment on gasification performance was investigated using multi-scale characterization. Results show that supercritical CO 2 exposure transformed the coal surface from dense to loose, prompting the development of numerous multi-scale pores and fractures. Specifically, the micropore volume and specific surface area increased from 0.0364 cm 3 /g and 168.231 m 2 /g to 0.0365 cm 3 /g and 169.455 m 2 /g, respectively. Similarly, the mesopore volume and specific surface area rose from 0.0190 cm 3 /g and 3.717 m 2 /g to 0.0198 cm 3 /g and 4.113 m 2 /g. During high-temperature simulated gasification, the raw and modified coal exhibited similar initial weight loss (9.19% and 9.38%, respectively). However, during the medium-temperature pyrolysis stage (200–600 °C), the modified coal showed a higher cumulative weight loss (23.68%) than the raw coal (17.02%). Consequently, the residual carbon rate at 1000 °C decreased from 18.06% to 15.84%, indicating that supercritical CO 2 modification promotes earlier volatile release and more complete gasification. Microscopic chemical evolution analysis indicated that the oxygen-containing functional groups were removed in the sequence: carboxyl group–ether bond/hydroxyl group–carbonyl group. The total content of these functional groups in the modified coal increased from 26.18% at 25 °C to 48.50% at 550 °C, before dropping to 34.24% at 600 °C. Concurrently, the proportion of aromatic carbon (C–C/C=C) reached 80.37%, notably higher than that of the raw coal (55.21%). In summary, supercritical CO 2 promotes volatile release, lowers gasification activation energy, and enhances overall reactivity. This is achieved through the synergistic regulation of pore structure, surface oxygenated intermediates, and carbon skeleton reorganization, establishing a cohesive “pore–surface–chemical state” regulatory framework.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: