Key result
Novel clinical nomogram predicts abdominal aortic calcification risk with an AUC of ~0.75.
Why the study?
Abdominal aortic calcification is a significant predictor of cardiovascular events and mortality, but lacks a simple predictive tool for early risk stratification.
Can a nomogram integrating demographic and clinical variables accurately predict the risk of abdominal aortic calcification?
Cross-Sectional (n=3,140)
Can a nomogram integrating demographic and clinical variables accurately predict the risk of abdominal aortic calcification?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.747 (95% CI 0.724-0.770)
A novel nomogram incorporating age, BMI, CVD, hypertension, and smoking status provides a practical and reliable tool for predicting abdominal aortic calcification risk without the need for specialized imaging.
May support AAC risk stratification with routine variables; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Abdominal aortic calcification (AAC), a significant predictor of cardiovascular events and mortality, lacks a simple predictive tool for early risk stratification. This study aimed to develop and validate a clinical nomogram for predicting AAC risk using accessible demographic, comorbidity, and lifestyle factors. Utilizing data from the 2013–2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) cohort, AAC was assessed via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) using the Kauppila scoring system (score > 0 defined AAC). Participants were stratified into training ( n = 2,198) and validation ( n = 942) cohorts. The nomogram was developed through multi-algorithm consensus, incorporating predictors selected by three robust methodologies: Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression, the best subsets regression (BSR) method and the Boruta algorithm. Model performance was evaluated through ROC, calibration, and decision curve analysis (DCA) curves. Five predictors—age, BMI, cardiovascular disease (CVD), hypertension, and smoking status—were identified. The nomogram demonstrated robust discrimination, with AUCs of 0.747 (95% CI: 0.724–0.770) and 0.700 (95% CI: 0.660–0.735) in training and validation cohorts, respectively. Calibration curves revealed strong agreement between predicted and observed probabilities. DCA curves confirmed clinical utility across risk thresholds. This validated nomogram provides a practical tool for AAC risk stratification using readily obtainable clinical parameters, enabling targeted interventions to mitigate calcification progression. Its integration into routine cardiovascular assessments may enhance preventive strategies in resource-limited settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) (n=3,140). Predictive nomogram (age, BMI, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, smoking status) was evaluated on Discrimination of the nomogram for predicting AAC risk (Area Under the Curve) in the training cohort (AUC 0.747, 95% CI 0.724-0.770). A predictive nomogram integrating age, BMI, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, and smoking status demonstrated robust discrimination for abdominal aortic calcification risk, achieving an AUC of 0.747.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: