Investigates dry ice's impact on mechanical performance and CO2 sequestration in cement materials, indicating optimal dosage effects.
This study investigates the influence of incorporating dry ice into cement-based materials at dosages of 0, 2, 10, and 20% (by cement weight) on hydration behaviour, microstructural development, mechanical performance, and CO2 sequestration potential. Dry ice (DI) was explored as a novel in situ CO2 source, and its effects were evaluated through compressive strength, split tensile strength, modulus of elasticity, and durability-related indicators. A comprehensive experimental program involving isothermal calorimetry, X-ray diffraction (XRD), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive spectroscopy (SEM/EDS), and electrical resistivity measurements was conducted. Results show that moderate DI dosages of 2% and 10% enhanced mechanical properties and promoted significant microstructural densification. An additional stage of DI dissolution occurred during early hydration, leading to a slight delay in reaction kinetics, however, it did not hinder the formation of calcium-silicate-hydrate or ettringite phases. XRD, SEM/EDS, and TGA analyses confirmed partial conversion of calcium hydroxide into calcium carbonate, contributing to a denser cement matrix. The net CO2 sequestration efficiency reached up to 96% at 2% dosage, 87% at 10% dosage, and 23% at 20% dosage of DI without compromising the compressive strength. The splitting tensile strength increased by 6.8%, 3.4%, and 1.5% for 2%, 10%, and 20% DI addition, respectively. The static modulus of elasticity of DI-2% was 15% higher than the control, while DI-10% and DI-20% showed 4.8% and 11.2% increases respectively. The 28-day electrical resistivity increased by approximately 25% for DI-2% relative to the control. Overall, the findings highlight the importance of optimising DI dosage to balance enhanced CO2 sequestration with improved material performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmad et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: