Narrative review develops a nursing education framework to address low back pain in care settings, indicating essential competencies.
Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of years lived with disability globally, and a major rehabilitation priority, yet nursing education often does not translate burden evidence into first-contact actions across care settings. This article aimed to develop a nursing education and practice framework that converts global LBP evidence into competencies for assessment, education, medication safety, referral, follow-up and occupational prevention. A focused, Global Burden of Disease-informed narrative review and practice-oriented educational synthesis was conducted. PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, Scopus, Google Scholar, and organisational sources were searched for burden estimates, clinical guidelines, pain education scholarship, nursing occupational health evidence and nurse-led self-management literature. Sources were selected for relevance to nurse-deliverable actions and curriculum assessment; systematic-review methods, meta-analysis and formal risk-of-bias appraisal were not used. Evidence was mapped iteratively to six nursing practice domains: red-flag triage and escalation; functional, psychosocial and contextual assessment; brief therapeutic education; medication safety and low-value-care reduction; follow-up and referral; and occupational prevention. The revised framework adds an explicit evidence-to-competency map, implementation guidance and evaluation indicators for undergraduate education, postgraduate training, continuing professional development, clinical supervision and quality improvement. LBP should be taught as a nursing-sensitive disability and rehabilitation priority, supporting nurses to screen for danger, validate pain, reduce threat, promote graded activity, monitor medicines, coordinate continuity and prevent occupational harm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sanchis‐Gimeno et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: