Examines Medicaid payment policies impacting methadone treatment access, suggesting needed changes for better care.
Background The potential of Methadone Maintenance Treatment (MMT) to address the opioid crisis has been limited by restrictive federal and local policies that required frequent clinic visits for medication. Unprecedented federal regulatory changes started in early COVID-19 and were made permanent in 2024, and allow clinics increased flexibility in granting take-home medication to patients. Medicaid payment policies can profoundly shape provider behaviors but may not align with regulatory changes. Methods We conducted a systematic synthesis of Medicaid MMT payment and billing policies among 40 states over 3/2020-7/2025. Results More than half of the states continued to adopt a per-dose or per-diem approach to paying for methadone dosing and a per-service approach to paying for addiction counseling, thus tying Medicaid revenue closely to clinic visits. More than one-quarter maintained a flat bundled payment dating back to pre-pandemic era that provided little incentive for granting patients more than one week of take-home medication. Adoption of a two-tiered bundled payment modeled after Medicare’s payment increased over time but remained limited. Conclusion Medicaid payment policies for MMT saw limited changes over the 5 years following initial federal regulatory changes. Practice changes towards more flexible and patient-centered care may be hindered without compatible changes in payment approaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: