Comparative study assesses electrochemical performance in layered and spinel lithium cobalt aluminium oxide, indicating potential for energy storage advancements.
Lithium cobalt aluminium oxide (LiCo 1-x Al x O 2 ) has broad application prospects, yet the study of its structure-performance relationship is still insufficient. Here, this study systematically compares the electrochemical performance and structure-performance relationship of layered LiCo 0.85 Al 0.15 O 2 (L-LCAO) and lithiated spinel LiCo 0.85 Al 0.15 O 2 (S-LCAO). L-LCAO, sintered at 950℃, is composed of micron-sized particles and shows a unit-cell-volume change rate of only 1.76%, with the two-phase reaction being significantly suppressed. In contrast, S-LCAO, sintered at 400℃, is composed of agglomerated nanoparticles, and exhibits a single-phase reaction with a unit-cell-volume change rate of only 0.60%. The small unit-cell-volume variations of L-LCAO and S-LCAO enable outstanding cycling stability, with capacity retentions of 94.8% and 90.2% after 50 cycles at 0.1C, respectively. L-LCAO delivers an initial discharge specific capacity of 133.3 mAh g -1 , higher than that of S-LCAO (106.4 mAh g -1 ). However, S-LCAO exhibits superior rate capability due to its faster Li + diffusivity rooted in three-dimensional Li + diffusion channels and its shorter Li + diffusion distances rooted in small primary particles. This study can provide important guide for the further development and optimization of energy storage materials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: