Why the study?
The study aimed to appraise clinical practice guidelines relevant to physical activity in patients with coronary heart disease and summarize consensus and discrepant recommendations.
What are the consensus and discrepant recommendations for physical activity in patients with coronary heart disease across clinical practice guidelines?
Systematic Review (n=32)
What are the consensus and discrepant recommendations for physical activity in patients with coronary heart disease across clinical practice guidelines?
This systematic review highlights the need for standardized, core FITT exercise prescription standards for patients with coronary heart disease due to inconsistencies across current guidelines.
Low consensus in 22 of 26 physical activity recommendations signals guideline inconsistency; challenges developers to harmonize FITT standards for CHD.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to appraise clinical practice guidelines relevant to physical activity in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and summarize consensus and discrepant recommendations. METHODS: The websites of organizations that develop guidelines, including those of cardiovascular and medical sports associations, were searched in addition to 9 literature databases from January 2014 to November 2024. The included guidelines were published in English or Chinese, labeled as a recommendation guideline, position paper, practice parameter, or consensus statement; and addressed physical activity for patients with coronary heart disease. Two authors independently extracted recommendations. Three reviewers independently assessed guideline quality using the AGREE II instrument. RESULTS: A total of 32 guidelines were included, with the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network and the American Heart Association deemed to have the highest methodological quality. A total of 26 consensus recommendations were identified, including general recommendations, principles for early in-hospital rehabilitation, and the FITT-VP principles for outpatient rehabilitation exercise prescriptions, of which 4 were classified as having moderate consensus and 22 as having low consensus. CONCLUSION: The guidelines have developed consensus recommendations for routine physical activity in patients with coronary heart disease. However, inconsistencies in exercise prescriptions indicate a need to develop core FITT standards that are applicable across various clinical settings and can be flexibly adapted to individual needs. Furthermore, international collaboration and standardization efforts should be pursued to enhance the applicability of evidence-based guidelines, and implementation frameworks should be introduced to bridge the gap between clinical practice and guideline recommendations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Coronary heart disease (n=32). Clinical practice guidelines for physical activity was evaluated on Consensus and discrepant recommendations. A systematic review of 32 clinical practice guidelines identified 26 consensus recommendations for physical activity in patients with coronary heart disease, of which 22 had low consensus.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: